
The three-month doping ban handed to Jannik Sinner has been slammed as far too lenient by many in the tennis world, with Australian Nick Kyrgios again leading the backlash.
Kyrgios declared on Saturday that “fairness in tennis does not exist” upon learning of Sinner’s settlement with the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) after testing positive to banned steroid clostebol.
WADA had originally sought a one-year ban for Sinner’s failed doping tests but the 23-year-old back-to-back Australian Open champ agreed to accept a shorter ban, knowing he will be back in action from May 4 in time to play the next grand slam, the French Open, which starts at Roland Garros on May 25.
The decision did not just prompt Kyrgios’s wrath, with the Novak Djokovic-founded Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA) citing a “lack of transparency” in the system, while three-time grand slam winner Stan Wawrinka posted on social media: “I don’t believe in a clean sport anymore.”
Kyrgios, who has been one of Sinner’s most outspoken critics since the Italian’s positive test came to light last year, continued posting on social media.
“So he was found guilty — hence the ban. But didn’t get stripped of anything and can play the French. Sad sad sad day,” he wrote on X.
“Obviously Sinner’s team have done everything in their power to just go ahead and take a 3 month ban, no titles lost, no prize money lost.
“Guilty or not? Sad day for tennis. Fairness in tennis does not exist.”
Kyrgios went on a tear on social media, labelling the decision “dodgy as”, and saying “a lot of players … are feeling the same way at the moment” on a “bad day for tennis”.
Former top 100 player Liam Broady was clearly one of those players, pointing out the convenience of Sinner not missing any slams.